AS 4100:2020

The AS 4100 engine implements AS 4100:2020 - Steel Structures, the Australian standard for the design of steel structures. The engine supports all common fabrication types and residual stress categories.

Open AS 4100:2020 Calculator

Standard Reference

StandardAS 4100:2020 (Steel Structures)
Design MethodLimit State Design (φ = 0.9)
UnitsMetric (kN, kNm, MPa, mm)
Verification SourcesSteel Structures Sample Worked Problems, Design Manual (Kirke/Al-Jamel), STAAD.Pro
Benchmark Results58 test cases, 0.11% average difference

Supported Section Types

  • I-Shapes (UB, UC - rolled and welded)
  • Channels (PFC)
  • Tees (BT, CT - beam tees and column tees cut from UB/UC parents)
  • Rectangular Hollow Sections (SHS, RHS - hot-formed and cold-formed)
  • Circular Hollow Sections (CHS)
  • Angles (EA, UA - equal and unequal)

Checks Performed

Section Classification (Table 5.2)

Classification is action-specific - different slenderness limits apply for members in compression versus flexure. Elements are classified using plate element slenderness (λe) against plasticity (λep) and yield (λey) limits.

Residual Stress Categories

The engine accounts for residual stresses via fabrication-dependent plate element yield slenderness limits:

CodeCategoryDescription
SRStress RelievedPost-fabrication heat treatment
HRHot RolledStandard rolled sections (UB, UC, PFC, EA/UA)
CFCold FormedCold-formed hollow sections
LWLightly WeldedLight welded fabrication
HWHeavily WeldedHeavy welded plate girders

Effective Section Properties (Clause 5.2 & 6.2)

For noncompact and slender sections, the engine computes effective section modulus Ze(Clause 5.2, for bending) and form factor Kf (Clause 6.2.4, for compression) using the governing plate element slenderness approach.

Tension (Clause 7)

  • φNt: Gross section yielding (φ × Ag × fy)
  • φNt: Net section fracture (φ × 0.85 × kt × An × fu)

Compression (Clause 6)

  • Section capacity: φNs = φ × Kf × A × fy
  • Member capacity: φNc = φ × Kf × A × fcr(λ) using member section constant αb per Table 6.3.3
  • Flexural-torsional buckling for monosymmetric sections (tees, channels)

Flexure (Clause 5)

  • Section moment capacity: φMs = φ × Ze × fy
  • Member moment capacity (LTB): φMb computed using αm (moment modification factor), kl (load height factor), and the elastic buckling moment Mo
  • Load height: kl = 1.4 for top-flange loading (destabilising), 1.0 for shear centre, 2.0 for cantilevers
  • αm: Auto-computed from the moment distribution along the member. Can be overridden in the calculator.
  • Monosymmetry constant βx included for channels and tees

Shear (Clause 5.11)

  • Strong-axis shear: web area for I-shapes and channels, two webs for RHS, full area with 0.36fy coefficient for CHS (Clause 5.11.4)
  • Weak-axis shear: flanges for I-shapes and channels, perpendicular walls for RHS
  • Design thickness (0.93× nominal) applied for cold-formed sections per AS/NZS 1163

Combined Actions (Clause 8)

  • Compression + Bending (8.3.3/8.3.4): General linear interaction is checked for all sections. For compact I-shapes and RHS, the alternative power-law form is also evaluated and the governing section ratio is taken conservatively.
  • Tension + Bending (8.3.2/8.3.4): General linear interaction is checked for all sections. For compact I-shapes and RHS, the alternative power-law form is also evaluated and the governing section ratio is taken conservatively.
  • Shear-Bending (5.12.3): Reduced shear capacity when M* > 0.75φMs

Calculator Inputs

The standalone AS4100 calculator accepts the following inputs. All values are in metric units.

Fabrication & Residual Stress

Two dropdowns control how residual stresses affect section classification and buckling:

SettingOptions
FabricationHot Rolled, Welded/Fabricated
Residual StressSR (Stress Relieved), HR (Hot Rolled), CF (Cold Formed), LW (Lightly Welded), HW (Heavily Welded)

The residual stress category determines the plate element yield slenderness limits (λey) in Table 5.2 and the member section constant (αb) in Table 6.3.3.

Load Height

For I-shapes, channels, and tees, a dropdown selects the load application point:

  • Shear Centre (kl = 1.0) - default, load applied at the shear centre
  • Top Flange (kl = 1.4) - load applied at top flange (destabilising for LTB)

When the Cantilever toggle is enabled with top flange loading, kl is automatically increased to 2.0 per Clause 5.6.3(2).

Section Geometry

Select a shape group, then enter dimensions or pick from the built-in section library (Australian sections).

ShapeDimensions
I-Shape (UB/UC)d (depth), bf (flange width), tw (web thickness), tf (flange thickness) - mm
Channel (PFC)d, b (width), tw, tf - mm
Tee (BT/CT)d, b (width), tw, tf - mm
RHS / SHSd (height), b (width), t (wall thickness) - mm
CHSD (diameter), t (wall thickness) - mm
Angle (EA/UA)d (leg 1), b (leg 2), t (thickness) - mm

Material Properties

SymbolDescriptionUnit
fyYield stressMPa
fuUltimate tensile strengthMPa

Member Lengths & Bracing

SymbolDescriptionUnit
LSystem member lengthm
Le,xEffective length for major-axis buckling (ke × L per Clause 4.6.3)m
Le,yEffective length for minor-axis buckling. Reduced if braced at intermediate points.m
LbEffective length for lateral-torsional buckling (kt × L per Clause 5.6.3)m
αmMoment modification factor (default 1.0 = uniform moment). Auto-computed in FEA tool.-

A Continuously Restrained checkbox sets Lb = 0, bypassing the LTB check.

Design Actions

SymbolDescriptionUnitSign Convention
N*Design axial forcekNPositive = compression
Mx*Major-axis bending momentkNm-
My*Minor-axis bending momentkNm-
Vx*Major-axis shear forcekN-
Vy*Minor-axis shear forcekN-

Capacity Reduction Factor

A single capacity reduction factor of φ = 0.9 is used across all checks (tension, compression, bending, and shear) per AS 4100:2020 Table 3.4.

Limitations & Notes

  • Single-element Ze: The effective section modulus calculation uses a governing-slenderness approach rather than simultaneously reducing all slender elements. This is conservative and accurate for standard rolled sections; rare edge cases with both slender flanges and webs may see minor differences.
  • Non-uniform shear distribution: The f*vm/f*va ratio in Clause 5.11.3 is chosen per section type and shear direction: 1.5 for rectangular flanges (I, tee, RHS), 2.0 for channel flange shear (asymmetric shear flow), Q·D/I elastic-flow ratio for I and channel webs, 1.0 (no reduction) for angle legs. AS4100 is silent on whether 5.11.3 applies to angles; the angle-leg choice follows common industry benchmark practice.
  • Cold-formed design thickness: 0.93× nominal thickness per AS/NZS 1163 is applied to slenderness calculations (b/t ratios) for cold-formed hollow sections, but not to gross area.
  • Sideways members: For members marked sideways=true, AS4100 major/minor design actions and capacities are reported after the section orientation mapping is applied. These design-axis results may not line up one-for-one with raw local My/Mz result labels or third-party report row headings for mono-symmetric sections (tees, channels, angles), even when the governing capacities match.
  • Flexural-torsional buckling: Monosymmetry constant βx is included in the LTB elastic buckling moment Mo for tees and channels. A standalone FTB member compression check is not performed. Channels and angles used as compression members should verify FTB separately per Clause 6.3.3.
  • Bearing capacity (Cl 5.13): Web bearing yield (Rby) and buckling (Rbb) at supports and point loads are not checked. Verify bearing capacity separately for concentrated loads and reactions.
  • αm computation: Auto-computed from the quarter-point moment distribution. For specific loading patterns, the manual override is available.
  • Torsion (Bredt-Batho): Not an input in the standalone calculator. In the FEA tool, torsion is checked for closed hollow sections (RHS/CHS) only. Warping torsion for open sections (I-beams, channels, angles, tees) is not performed.

Verification

The engine is benchmarked against 58 independent test cases from the Steel Structures Sample Worked Problems, the Design Manual by Kirke and Al-Jamel, and STAAD.Pro verification cases, with an average difference of 0.11%.